ShareThis Page
Daily News roundup: McKeesport defeats Woodland Hills |

Daily News roundup: McKeesport defeats Woodland Hills

Staff Reports
| Tuesday, January 6, 2015 11:12 p.m

Jordan Payne finished with 31 points and seven assists to lead McKeesport to a 75-66 victory over Woodland Hills in Section 2-AAAA play Tuesday.

Dee Diggs collected 11 points, seven assists and five steals for the Tigers (7-3, 3-1). Khalil Purdue had 14 points and pulled down 11 rebounds in the win. Avram Abramovitz led Woodland Hills (2-9, 0-5) with 23 points.

South Allegheny 48, Ford City 38 — DaVonte Johnson scored a game-high 16 points to lead South Allegheny (3-8, 2-2) to a Section 2-AA win. Tywaun Igles added 15 points.

Jeannette 52, Serra Catholic 32 — Sophomore Mark Wormack netted 15 points to lead Jeannette (5-6, 3-0) to a Section 4-A victory. Fellow sophomore Mike Pompei added 12 points for the Jayhawks.

Girls basketball

McKeesport 61, WoodlandHills 36 — In Section 2-AAAA, sophomore Johnasia Cash scored 25 points to help McKeesport (6-3, 3-1) snap its three-game losing skid. T.T. Burke scored 14 points for the Tigers.

East Allegheny 60, Bentworth 27 — Amani Johnson led all scorers with 13 points as East Allegheny collected a nonsection win. Ashley Harner added 11 points for Wildcats. Cache Street and Myla Bortoluzzi had 10 points each.

Serra Catholic 62, Ellis School 36 — Katie Sieg finished with 25 points to power Serra Catholic (7-4, 4-0) to a Section 4-A win. Felicia Moon had 14 points for the Eagles.

Thomas Jefferson 45, Moon 36 — Haley Zoglmann had 19 points, and Marina Petruzzi added 10 to lead Thomas Jefferson to a nonsection win.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.