ShareThis Page
Daily News roundup: Serra Catholic boys shut out McKeesport |

Daily News roundup: Serra Catholic boys shut out McKeesport

| Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:30 p.m

Lucas Batz made four saves to secure the shutout as Serra Catholic scored a 5-0 win over McKeesport in a nonsection boys soccer contest Tuesday night.

Serra Catholic (10-3-3), which has won three straight games, will learn its opening-round opponent when the WPIAL playoff pairings are announced Wednesday.

Elizabeth Forward 4, Gateway 1— Nathan Forsythe scored twice and Zach Martik and Dave Saunders also scored to lead Elizabeth Forward (7-9-2) to a nonsection win.

Jeff Ragan had two assists, and goalie Ryan Lee made 12 saves in the win.

Thomas Jefferson 2, Baldwin 0 — Matt Prezioso and Owen Haythorn scored, and Colin Bucsok earned the shutout as No. 3 Thomas Jefferson (16-1-1) earned a nonsection win.

Girls soccer

Norwin 2, North Allegheny 0 — Emily Harrigan and Micayla Livingston scored to carry No. 2 Norwin over North Allegheny (12-4-1) in a nonsection matchup.

Sam Wexell recorded the shutout for Norwin (18-0), which has allowed three goals while scoring 114 during the regular season.

Steel Valley 1, Springdale 0 — Jordan Butko scored the winning goal for Steel Valley (5-11-1, 4-10-1) in a Section 4-A victory over Springdale (11-6-0, 10-5-0).

Veronica Sikora recorded the shutout.

Girls volleyball

Thomas Jefferson 3, Seton-La Salle 2— After falling being 2-0, Thomas Jefferson rebounded to win the final three sets to capture a Section 6-AA victory that forced a three-way tie for first place between the Jaguars, Seton-La Salle and South Fayette, who all are 11-2.

The match was delayed in the fifth set when the power went out.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.