ShareThis Page
Dauphin County lawyer sues Allegheny County over fee for assessment database |

Dauphin County lawyer sues Allegheny County over fee for assessment database

| Wednesday, June 27, 2007 12:00 a.m

A Dauphin County man sued Allegheny County on Tuesday over what he considers an exorbitant fee of $1,000 to obtain the county’s property assessment database.

Craig J. Staudenmaier states in the lawsuit that in April, he requested the database in electronic form to be placed on a compact disc. He did not request any special format or special extracts, the lawsuit states.

Staudenmaier, a Harrisburg lawyer, is accusing the county of violating the state’s Right to Know Law by charging excessive fees for public records. County offiicals could copy the database in less than one hour and without using extra personnel, the lawsuit states.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.