Deal: Homeless children to be schooled by Carlynton |

Deal: Homeless children to be schooled by Carlynton

The state Department of Education agreed in a lawsuit involving the Carlynton School District that schools must enroll homeless children with a “substantial connection” to their district even if the children sleep in another district.

The Education Law Center sued the district after the state said Carlynton wasn’t legally required to enroll four children whose parents were using a Crafton day shelter as their home address.

Operated by the Interfaith Hospitality Network of Southwestern Pennsylvania, the shelter provides homeless families with a place to store belongings and receive mail while churches in the network take turns providing families with sleeping space.

Consequently, the family was sleeping in a different location each week.

Nancy Hubley, the Education Law Center attorney who represented the family, said the settlement being finalized in court today is an important victory for homeless families across the state.

“The economic crisis has forced many Pennsylvania families out of their homes, but it should not force children out of school,” she said.

Carlynton Superintendent Michael Panza said the district never sought to kick the students out but was simply seeking a ruling on its obligations.

“Day shelters were new. We wanted a clarification,” he said.

As part of the settlement, the district notified the church network it will enroll any children whose families use the day center, Panza said.

The attorney for the Education Department couldn’t be reached for comment. Hubley said the state agreed in the settlement to rescind its previous ruling that Carlynton wasn’t obligated to educate the children.

The department issued a notice to all districts in February making it clear they’re required to provide school services for children connected to day shelters or similar facilities, she said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.