ShareThis Page
Deck collapse at Bullskin Township home injures four |

Deck collapse at Bullskin Township home injures four

| Friday, August 20, 2010 12:00 a.m

Four people were injured when a deck collapsed at a Bullskin Township home yesterday afternoon.

Fayette County 911 said the incident took place shortly before 4:30 p.m. at 161 Spruce Hollow Road.

Kyle Quinn, Bullskin fire captain, said the deck was on the rear of the house. He described the structure’s dimensions as 20 feet by 30 feet.

Three woman and a 22-month-old boy were on the deck that toppled, leaving them falling about 10 to 15 feet onto a concrete patio. Quinn said it was fortunate no one was under the deck as it collapsed.

“It just seemed like it was structurally deficient,” Quinn said about the deck, adding the residents of the house had not lived there long and the deck was there when they moved into the residence. “The deck flipped over and collapsed, everybody rolled toward the house. It could have been a lot worse.”

Quinn said one woman was flown to UPMC Presbyterian hospital in Oakland by STAT MedEvac. He described her injuries as not life threatening.

“She was conscious,” he said. “(They were) more lower extremity than anything.”

The helicopter landed at Bullskin Elementary School, about a quarter-mile away from the house.

Quinn said the other three patients were taken to Excela Health Frick Hospital in Mt. Pleasant.

Emergency personnel remained on the scene for about an hour.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.