ShareThis Page
DeFazio’s decision |

DeFazio’s decision

| Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:00 a.m

It will be a sad end to the career of Allegheny County Sheriff Pete DeFazio. The sheriff, expected to be re-elected in November, says his third four-year term will be his last.

Mr. DeFazio, who joined the department in 1970 as a deputy, says he no longer will abide being entangled in a culture that thrives on scandal.

His office is assailed by a federal grand jury investigation that so far has produced indictments against two top deputies. We remind they are innocent unless proven guilty. No charges have been brought against the sheriff.

We’re sorry for Pete’s decision. His numerous awards for service to Allegheny County attest to his stature in the community. Last year he won the first Crime Prevention Award from the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency. People correctly believe he’s been doing a good job.

How• From the time he took office, Mr. DeFazio put a priority on clearing bench warrants, and he was especially interested in tracking down deadbeat dads who owed money for child support.

In 1998, his first year in office, he cleared 5,863 warrants, up from 817 the year before. Last year his office cleared 7,663. He’s on the same pace this year. As sheriff, he has cleared nonsupport warrants of nearly $106.5 million .

Despite his troubles, we expect Sheriff DeFazio will continue his exemplary work. That’s the kind of guy he is.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.