ShareThis Page
Demand reform in foster system |

Demand reform in foster system

| Friday, August 15, 2003 12:00 a.m

The law as it exists presumes the best solution is to reunite the family. Most of these kids don’t come from a “family.”

Who forgot Kristen Tatar• The answer is everyone did. The tiny 4-year-old found starved to death and stuffed in a cooler in her back yard fell through the cracks of an antiquated system with antiquated laws and understaffed offices. She became the victim of laws that presume rather than prove the parents fit and was sent to people who had repeatedly proven that they hated this child even though they were the biological parents.

The parents who loved her were some of the foster parents who cared for her, but who had no claim to her and could not protect her from whom she needed protection. This child was in foster care from the time she was an infant, when she was discovered severely neglected and deformed. Physical therapy and the love and attention of the fostering community made her well and strong.

The system needs to change, and it takes all who read this to demand changes from lawmakers and to remind everyone they meet to contact their legislators and push for reform of the foster system. The law as it exists presumes the best solution is to reunite the family. Most of these kids don’t come from a “family,” only a biologically linked unit. The ability to conceive does not guarantee a family, as is proven by legalized abortion.

There is no excuse for a caseworker not to recognize one of his or her children by sight, nor is there any reason to assume everything is OK when the child cannot be produced on demand. Children who have been severely abused or neglected cannot be turned back over to the parents with a file marked “case closed.” These parents need to be closely monitored for at least a year. Failure to comply with doctor appointments or CYS visitations need to be considered as contempt of court and dealt with accordingly, in addition to termination of parental rights.

If this seems severe, I ask everyone to remember the “Tatar tot” locked up alone in a room, slowly starving to death, crying for mothers who loved her, not understanding why they deserted her, and becoming weaker as days go by, undoubtedly lying in her own waste, then hidden in a cooler like so much unwanted garbage.

This was the fate of the child I loved, whom I was not allowed to keep, who sat on my knee as I read to her, who giggled with glee as she opened presents or played with other children, little blond curls bouncing on her head as she chased and played.

She had a health problem that was resolved, and she should have had a long life ahead of her. She was loving and lovable. This was Krissy, not the sickly child that has been described.

She was an angel in disguise. Please don’t let her death be forgotten. Don’t allow another child to fall victim to these monstrous types of people disguised as parents. Demand justice for Kristen. Call or write your legislator today .

Eileen Condie
Hempfield Township

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.