Democrats ask for federal investigation into Sandusky probe |

Democrats ask for federal investigation into Sandusky probe

HARRISBURG — State House Democrats on Wednesday asked for a federal review of then-state Attorney General Tom Corbett’s investigation of Jerry Sandusky.

Democratic leaders sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder asking for a special counsel. Corbett, a Republican from Shaler, is now governor.

A jury in June convicted the ex-Penn State assistant football coach on 45 of 48 counts of child sex abuse, which vindicates how Corbett handled the case, said spokesman Kevin Harley.

Democrats have asked why the attorney general “took so long” to arrest Sandusky.

It took the attorney general’s office 33 months to arrest Sandusky and charge two Penn State administrators accused of taking part in a cover up. Corbett became governor in January 2011, and the investigation continued under his replacement, Linda Kelly.

“It is clear that this case is crying out for an independent eye to carefully review the investigation of Mr. Sandusky by the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General,” said Minority Leader Frank Dermody, D-Oakmont.

Sandusky, 68, of State College, last week was sentenced to 30 to 60 years in prison.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.