Democrats find solution to squabble over control of state committee |

Democrats find solution to squabble over control of state committee

HARRISBURG — Katie McGinty, Democratic gubernatorial nominee Tom Wolf’s choice to head the Democratic State Committee, is withdrawing her challenge to party Chairman Jim Burn and will chair a committee to help elect Wolf in November.

The Wolf campaign on Thursday announced he is forming Campaign for a Fresh Start to get Democrats, Republicans and Independents to vote for him. McGinty, who will play a key role in Wolf’s effort to oust Republican Gov. Tom Corbett, said Wolf is “a different kind of leader and this will be a different kind of campaign.”

“We need to shake up the status quo, and that goes from everything to changing the way we campaign to changing the way we govern,” she said.

G. Terry Madonna, a professor of political science at Franklin and Marshall College, said “the last thing he needs is an internal fight to destroy the party. Tom Wolf wants to take a unified Democratic Party into this fall’s election.”

Controlling money for the Wolf campaign from national Democratic organizations was said to be one reason that Wolf wanted his own person at the state committee. But in an email to state committee members last week, Wolf’s pitch for McGinty was broader: “Democrats throughout Pennsylvania will have an energetic and compassionate voice who will fight for middle-class families. Katie will bring endless enthusiasm to counties throughout Pennsylvania. … She will be our voice.”

Burn, of Millvale, refused to stand down. On Thursday he congratulated McGinty on her new position.

“She brings a dynamic personality and skill set that will certainly help Tom Wolf as we all move forward,” he said.

Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald said he supports Fresh Start and Wolf’s approach.

“Unfortunately, Mr. Burn is more worried about himself than the party,” Fitzgerald said.

Burn, a Pittsburgh-area attorney, once served on Allegheny County Council and as Millvale mayor. He has said he would not resign because he believed leadership of the state organization should be a decision from the rank-and-file, not a top-down one.

Wolf’s move allows both men to save face without a showdown at the state committee meeting near Harrisburg on Saturday.

Mike Mikus, McGinty’s campaign manager, said McGinty had the votes but withdrew in the interest of party unity.

“We applaud Tom Wolf’s creation of a new campaign program that will help us take back the majority,” said Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa, D-Forest Hill.

“This is an innovative campaign effort, modeled after many successful campaign programs, both in Pennsylvania and nationally,” said Sen. Matt Smith, D-Mt. Lebanon, co-chair of the Senate Democratic Campaign Committee.

Wolf last week chose McGinty, a former Department of Environmental Protection Secretary under ex-Gov. Ed Rendell, as his choice to head the party. McGinty was one of three candidates who ran against the better-financed Wolf, who won the May 20 primary in a landslide.

McGinty, of Chester County, was widely credited with running a positive campaign. She was a former environmental adviser at the Clinton White House.

Wolf, a York businessman who ran as an outsider, won all 67 counties with a comprehensive TV ad campaign. The owner of a furniture distribution and supply company, he also served in Rendell’s Cabinet as secretary of Revenue.

“This is probably the best for the party,” said Pam Janvey, Pennsylvania Democratic Party recording secretary. “If there’s anything you don’t want, it’s to tear the party asunder.”

McGinty can be a campaign spokeswoman without inciting a tug-of-war over control of the party, said Janvey, of Bensalem Township in Bucks County.

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media’s state Capitol reporter. He can be reached at 717-787-1405 and [email protected]. Gideon Bradshaw is an intern with the Pennsylvania Legislative Correspondents Association. He can be reached at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.