Demographer predicts Franklin Regional’s drop in students will start to reverse in 2025 |

Demographer predicts Franklin Regional’s drop in students will start to reverse in 2025

Patrick Varine

As Franklin Regional school officials move ahead with a study to determine what improvements will be necessary at buildings throughout the district, they need to consider a projected drop in the number of high school students, according to a retired Carnegie Mellon professor.

While births across the district have dropped steadily for more than a decade, that trend isn’t expected to continue forever, demographer Shelby Stewman told school board members this week.

Births districtwide decreased 22 percent in a decade, from a high of 224 in 2004 to 174 in 2014.

“That’s reflected in the numbers for your elementary schools,” said Stewman. “But the most important thing is that I expect a big turnaround.”

That reversal is connected to what Stewman called an “echo boom,” which includes the current generation tagged as “millennials.” It follows the original “baby boom” that peaked nationally in 1957 and the “baby bust,” which bottomed out toward the mid-1970s.

The effect of that turnaround as reflected in district enrollment, however, is unlikely to happen in the next decade.

Stewman said the most likely of projection models he ran was one in which:

• Elementary enrollment climbs steadily from about 1,400 in 2016 to 1,540 in 2025;

• Middle school enrollment remains relatively steady, hovering in the mid-700s range;

• High school enrollment drops from more than 1,200 to just under 1,000.

In running six different models, the high school enrollment drop ranged from 100 to 230, which would be a roughly 19 percent drop from the current student population.

Stewman said the “echo boom” is likely to last until 2040. In the meantime, district enrollment will make up some ground thanks to families moving into the district with preschool-age children.

“It’s sort of ironic given that there’s no housing boom,” Stewman said, noting a peak of 138 new houses built in 2002 has fallen to “40-something” now. “That’s not to be critical of Murrysville; that’s just the reality.”

Stewman said he anticipates high school enrollment eventually will grow, though not in the next decade.

“It will drop way down, and then it will have to feed back up from kindergarten on forward,” he said.

Now a consultant, Stewart has done demographic studies for several school districts in the region, including Pine-Richland, North Hills, Plum and Hampton, He was paid $16,000 for the Franklin Regional analysis.

School board President Larry Borland said the information Stewman presented is valuable in light of decisions the board will need to make soon regarding its buildings.

“There are a lot of factors that come into play regarding refurbishing and remodeling,” Borland said. “One of the big issues is what our student population probably or possibly will be, and this will help us make the best decision possible about the future.”

District officials will learn more about that future at 6 p.m. Thursday, when the second of three meetings on a facilities study is held at Franklin Regional Middle School, 4660 Old William Penn Highway, Murrysville.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2862 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.