Denomination eyes ‘occupation’ profits |

Denomination eyes ‘occupation’ profits

Jason Cato

The Presbyterian Church (USA) on Thursday could become the first major U.S. Christian denomination to divest funds from U.S. companies accused of illegally profiting from Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories, much to the chagrin of the local Jewish federation.

The 220th General Assembly meeting in Pittsburgh will consider a recommendation that it drop investments in Caterpillar, Hewlett-Packard and Motorola Solutions — companies that produce products that the church’s Mission Responsibility Through Investment committee said are being used to help Israeli forces in an illegal occupation.

The General Assembly also will consider a recommendation to boycott certain products made by Israeli companies located on occupied land.

“This would highlight the fact that the church doesn’t want to be complicit in criminal acts,” said Rami Khouri, director of the Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs at the American University of Beirut and editor-at-large for The Daily Star, an English-language newspaper in Beirut.

The Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh hopes the assembly shoots down the proposals, said spokesman Jeff Cohan.

“This issue has galvanized the American-Jewish community in a way that hasn’t been seen in 20 years,” he said.

Separate letters urging Presbyterians to reject divestment resolutions were signed by more than 1,500 rabbis and 22,000 Jews. Cohan said that shows how steadfast Jews in the United States are in opposing it.

Khouri spoke on Wednesday at the Westin Hotel, Downtown, about the Arab Spring and the Israel-Palestine conflict during an event sponsored by the Israel Palestine Mission Network, a pro-divestment group of the Presbyterian Church.

Presbyterian Church (USA), based in Louisville, is the country’s largest Presbyterian group with 1.95 million members.

A U.S.-born, Palestinian-Greek-Orthodox Christian, Khouri said Presbyterians this week have agonized over appearing anti-Israel. He said he hopes the assembly passes the divestment and boycott measures but states its support for Israel’s right to be a nation.

Cohan said he recognizes the Presbyterians’ long-standing ties to Christians in the Middle East and their desire to support them.

“But to do it in such an irresponsible fashion and with such disregard to what actually is going on is astounding,” he said.

Neither Motorola nor Hewlett-Packard has addressed the calls for divestment. Caterpillar denies providing armored tractors or selling to Israel, instead saying equipment is traded to the U.S. government and resold to Israel.

A vote to divest would have little financial impact on the three companies, Cohan and Khouri agreed, but said it would send a message, though they differed on the meaning.

For Cohan, the message would be anti-Israel. For Khouri, it would be anything but.

“They are not talking about Israel; they’re talking about the occupation,” Khouri said. “This isn’t anti-Semitic or against Israel.”

Jason Cato is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7936 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.