DEP: Work to begin on untreated waterwater and sludge at Conemaugh disposal site |

DEP: Work to begin on untreated waterwater and sludge at Conemaugh disposal site

Jason Cato

Workers could begin as early as next week cleaning up untreated wastewater and sludge from coal mines and drilling operations left by a closed treatment company before it spills into the recovering Conemaugh River, the state Department of Environmental Protection said Wednesday.

A holding pond at the former Tunnelton Liquids Co. site in Conemaugh, Indiana County, near the border with Westmoreland County, contains 3.2 million gallons of untreated water and approximately 12,000 cubic yards of sludge containing Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material, or TENORM, said DEP spokesman John Poister.

“We feared if left alone, that pond would eventually overflow,” Poister said. “The Conemaugh has been making a comeback in recent years. So we decided to make an intervention.”

The work is expected to cost $2.4 million, which will be covered through the state's Hazardous Sites Cleanup Fund.

Tunnelton Liquids, which closed in April 2014, was formed to treat acid mine drainage from an abandoned deep mine. It also treated wastewater from oil and gas drilling.

In May 2011, the federal Environmental Protection Agency told the company that mixing acid mine drainage with “oil-field brine” is not authorized.

The company pumped many materials it received into a settlement pond about an acre in size and located near the riverbank, Poister said.

The wastewater will be treated and the sludge disposed of in approved landfills in Pennsylvania. None of the materials have entered the Conemaugh, Poister said.

“We don't want that at all,” he said. “We want to get it remediated.”

DEP officials are still considering whether to pursue the former company owner to recoup some cleanup costs, Poister said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.