Dermody lays claim to 11th term |

Dermody lays claim to 11th term

This election proved to be much easier for state Rep. Frank Dermody, who on Tuesday laid claim to his 11th term in the Legislature.

The Oakmont Democrat defeated Republican Gerry Vaerewyck of West Deer for the 33rd Legislative District seat. According to unofficial totals, Dermody won 56 percent of the vote to Vaerewyck’s 44 percent.

It appeared late last night that Dermody — until January the majority whip and third ranking member in the Legislature — will be the most senior leader returning to the state House’s Democratic caucus.

House Speaker Keith R. McCall is retiring. Republican Doyle Heffley appeared to be headed to victory over Democrat Justin Yaich in McCall’s Carbon County district.

State Rep. Todd Eachus, the majority leader from Luzerne County, was lost his contest to Republican Tarah Toohil.

Dermody squeaked by in 2008, narrowly defeating Jason Davidek. The situation was the same in 2006 when he barely edged Eileen Watt.

In addressing his supporters last night at Futules’ Harmar House, Dermody referenced those elections by saying he felt more comfortable claiming victory relatively soon after the polls closed.

“It’s a lot better doing this at 20 minutes after 10, than 20 minutes after 12,” he said.

As for his legislative priorities, Dermody said he wants to work to create and retain jobs, address educational needs at the K-12 and college levels and tackle transportation issues.

Vaerewyck said his chances were hurt by an advertising campaign attacking his tax record.

“The polls looked favorable for me before that started,” Vaerewyck said. “(Dermody) totally reversed things with that campaign.”

Vaerewyck said he worries that elections for state House will increasingly turn negative because of the success of the “negative” campaign against him.

“It will set a precedent,” he said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.