District, Hamilton added to lawsuit |

District, Hamilton added to lawsuit

In a prom week move, the Ringgold School District and Assistant Superindendent Gary Hamilton were added as defendants to a law suit involving two high school teachers in the aftermath of the 2005 prom.

A joinder was filed this week in Washington County Common Pleas Court by attorney John Wall, of Pittsburgh, on behalf of defendant Lynda Robinson.

The legal document adds the district and Hamilton to a civil law suit filed Dec. 14 by attorney Herman Bigi, of Charleroi, on behalf of Megan Pankiewicz against Robinson.

The initial suit was filed because of comments allegedly made following the 2005 prom.

Pankiewicz is an English teacher at Ringgold High School.

Robinson is a high school math teacher in the district.

According to the suit, the defendant and the plaintiff were chaperones at the prom, held May 13 at the Hilton Garden Inn Hotel at Southpointe. Also present at the prom were Dwayne Homa, high school principal; Jeff Matty, assistant high school principal; Beth Horchak, high school math teacher; and Ottie Caruso, head of security at the high school.

On May 20, Pankiewicz was taken from her class to the administration building and confronted by Hamilton, according to the suit.

Hamilton asked Pankiewicz about false accusations that she “participated in sexual behavior and misconduct” with Homa, Matty and Caruso, specifically in the hospitality room, the suit states.

The suit claims Hamilton also asked Pankiewicz about false statements alleging she stayed overnight in the hospitality room with Homa and Matty.

The suit further claims that Robinson falsely stated that Pankiewicz received a better schedule for the 2005-06 school year as a result.

Subsequently, Robinson was suspended for three days without pay.

The suit claims the comments allegedly made by Robinson caused Pankiewicz “severe emotional distress, pain, anguish, humiliation and embarrassment.”

The motion filed this week claims that Pankiewicz filed a complaint with the district against Robinson for purported violation of the district’s unlawful harassment policy.

The suit claims the district refused to provide documents related to interviews it held with 25 district employees during its investigation.

According to the suit, Robinson denies the allegations made by Pankiewicz in the initial suit.

The joinder, however, states that if Pankiewicz sustained any damages, it was a result of the district and Hamilton failing to conduct a proper investigation, including keeping confidential statements made by Robinson during the investigation.

Ringgold Superintendent Ed Repka and Hamilton were in a meeting this morning and were unavailable for comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.