ShareThis Page
DNA test to confirm body’s identity |

DNA test to confirm body’s identity

Afzal Nadeem
| Saturday, May 18, 2002 12:00 a.m

KARACHI, Pakistan — Hair and blood samples from a dismembered body were sent for DNA testing Friday as authorities sought to confirm whether they had found the remains of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl.

The body was removed from a shallow grave on property Pakistan state television said was owned by Al-Rashid Trust, a group the United States has identified as a terrorist organization.

The body was found near a blood-spattered shed where authorities believe Pearl was held before his videotaped murder. In the shack, police found a car seat that resembled one in pictures sent to news agencies by Pearl’s kidnappers, chief investigator Mansour Mughal said.

Samples of blood on the walls of the shed were taken for DNA testing, Mughal said. A jacket resembling the track suit Pearl was photographed wearing was found buried in the grave with the body, he said.

The body was cut into 10 pieces and included a severed head, Mughal said.

It could be a week before the results of DNA tests are known, police Chief Kamal Shah said.

Police were told where the body could be found by three new suspects arrested Thursday. Pakistan television identified the three as members of the outlawed Lashkar-e-Janghvi, a radical Islamic group with links to al-Qaida whose members were suspected of taking refuge in Afghanistan during the Taliban rule.

The body was found barely 500 yards from a large Islamic religious school, Jamia Rashidia, that was founded by Mufti Rashid, the same man who began Al-Rashid Trust.

The United States froze the assets of Al-Rashid Trust after accusing it of being a conduit for money to al-Qaida to finance international terrorism.

Shah, the Karachi police chief, refused to confirm whether police suspect al-Qaida involvement in Pearl’s kidnapping and murder, but he didn’t rule it out.

“I don’t want to reveal my cards yet,” he said. “To say anything now would be like putting the cart before the horse.”

According to Mughal, the chief investigator, the shed resembled the background in photographs of Pearl.

“We think this is the room where Pearl may have been held for two or three days,” Mughal said.

So far, the three newest suspects have not been formally charged. Police say they believe the men were among seven being sought in connection with Pearl’s disappearance and death.

Four Islamic radicals have been on trial since April 22 on charges of murder and kidnapping in the case. They have pleaded innocent. Chief prosecutor Raja Quereshi refused to comment about how the latest developments would affect his case, saying it was too early to tell.

Wall Street Journal spokesman Steve Goldstein also declined to comment. Pearl’s wife, Mariane, is nine months pregnant and expecting her first child in days.

Pearl, 38, disappeared Jan. 23 from outside a restaurant in Karachi while researching possible links between Pakistani extremists and Richard C. Reid, who was arrested in December on a flight from Paris to Miami with explosives in his shoes.

A gruesome three-minute video was delivered to U.S. officials in Karachi on Feb. 21 showing Pearl’s death.

In yesterday’s proceedings, the judge put off until Tuesday a decision on a prosecution request to send a panel to Britain to videotape testimony from Pearl’s wife.

The judge also rejected a prosecution request to recall a handwriting expert, who in earlier testimony linked two of the suspects to handwritten drafts of e-mails later sent by the kidnappers. Quereshi, the prosecutor, said he might appeal.

After his disappearance, e-mails with photos of a captive Pearl were sent to foreign and local news publications. They were signed by a previously unknown group demanding better treatment for the suspected Taliban and al-Qaida men being held in Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba.

U.S. investigators traced the e-mails to one of the four men on trial, Fahad Naseem, who in turn identified British-born militant Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh as the mastermind, police said. Naseem’s cousin, Salman Saqib, and former policeman Sheikh Mohammed Adeel are also on trial.

The trial, which resumes today, is closed to reporters, who have to rely on defense attorneys and prosecutors for details of the proceedings.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.