‘Do-not-call’ legislation speeds through Congress |

‘Do-not-call’ legislation speeds through Congress

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — With remarkable speed and near unanimity, Congress on Thursday passed legislation intended to ensure consumers can block many unwanted telemarketing calls. But whether the service millions of Americans signed up for takes effect next week was thrown into doubt when a second federal court judge ruled the list violates free speech protections.

U.S. District Judge Edward W. Nottingham in Denver blocked the list late Thursday, handing another victory to telemarketers who argued the national registry is unconstitutional and will devastate their industry. In a suit filed by the American Teleservices Association and several telemarketing companies, Nottingham ruled that the Federal Trade Commission “entangled itself too much in the consumers’ decision by manipulating consumer choice and favoring speech by charitable (organizations) over commercial speech.”

His decision came shortly after the House and Senate voted overwhelmingly for a bill making clear that the FTC has the power to enforce the “do-not-call” list. The legislation was prompted by an earlier ruling by a federal judge in Oklahoma City who said the FTC lacked the power to create and operate the registry.

The House voted 412-8 and the Senate 95-0 for the bill. President Bush said he looked forward to signing it. “Unwanted telemarketing calls are intrusive, annoying and all too common,” he said in a statement.

The list that would block an estimated 80 percent of telemarketing calls is supposed to be effective Wednesday, but it’s unclear whether legal issues will be settled by then. Even after Bush signs the legislation, the FTC must win in court for the list to move forward.

Pennsylvania officials said on Wednesday that the state’s do-not-call list won’t be affected by the earlier federal court ruling. The state will continue enforcing its program to block solicitations by telemarketers. It was unclear how yesterday’s ruling would affect the state’s list.

Despite the uncertainty, the FTC is encouraging people to continue signing up for the list at the Web site or by calling (888) 382-1222.

The FTC asked U.S. District Court Judge Lee R. West to block the order he issued Tuesday declaring the agency lacked proper authority to oversee the list. He declined yesterday and the FTC immediately appealed to the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver.

The FTC had no immediate comment on Nottingham’s ruling, but it also probably will end up with the 10th Circuit.

During brief debates, House and Senate members made it clear they want the list.

“Clearly the court’s decision was misguided,” said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., referring to West. “The measure before us makes crystal clear the commission can and should proceed with the do-not-call list.”

He said the ruling has “served as a rallying cry for the tens of millions of American households who signed up for the registry.”

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said no one likes “hopping up and down like jackrabbits to answer the phone and then hear somebody on the phone try to sell you something. It drives you crazy.”

Rep. Billy Tauzin, R-La., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said he is confident West’s decision will be overturned.

“We should probably call the bill ‘This Time We Really Mean It Act’ to cure any myopia in the judicial branch,” he said.

The ruling caught lawmakers off guard but they responded with remarkable speed. Bills can take months or even years to pass, but the do-not-call legislation was drafted and approved in both chambers in little more than 24 hours.

The rapid response underscored the popularity of the list, which after fewer than four months already has nearly 51 million numbers.

“This legislation got to the House floor faster than a consumer can hang up on a telemarketer at dinnertime,” said Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass.

Since issuing the ruling, West’s home and office have been bombarded with calls from angry consumers. His numbers were posted on the Internet and people were encouraged to call.

“They just keep calling to harass us, like the telemarketers harass them, I guess,” said Rick Wade, operations manager at the district clerk’s office.

Despite the torrent of angry calls yesterday, West rejected the FTC’s request to block his order, saying the agency offered no additional evidence that would make him change his mind.

The FTC expects the list to block four of every five telemarketing calls. Exemptions include calls from charities, pollsters and on behalf of politicians.

The FTC’s rules require telemarketers to check the list every three months to see who does not want to be called. Those who call listed people could be fined up to $11,000 for each violation. Consumers would file complaints to an automated phone or online system.

Telemarketers say the list would severely harm their industry and lead to the loss of thousands of jobs. Still, the Direct Marketing Association, one of the groups that challenged the registry, said it has asked its members to acquiesce to those enrolled in the registry.

“It is appropriate for marketers to respect the wishes of consumers,” said H. Robert Wientzen, the association’s president.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.