ShareThis Page
Doctors give medical dramas a good bill of health |

Doctors give medical dramas a good bill of health

| Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:00 a.m

LOS ANGELES — Recent TV hospital dramas such as “ER” accurately depict modern medicine, but should focus more on current controversies such as insurance and nursing shortages, according to doctors at a panel discussion on how television portrays their profession.

The discussion last week, titled “It Must Be True, I Saw it on TV,” came on the last day of the American Medical Association’s national leadership conference.

Dozens of doctors, nurses and medical students attended the session. “ER” star Noah Wyle was among a group of TV industry representatives taking part.

Many of the medics praised NBC’s “ER” and now-defunct programs such as “St. Elsewhere” in the 1980s and the recent “Chicago Hope” for de-romanticizing the image of doctors as miracle workers — an image created by the 1960s shows “Marcus Welby, M.D.” and “Dr. Kildare.”

In those older shows, “all the medicine happened behind closed doors,” said Randolph Smoak, the AMA’s former president.

By contrast, today’s medical dramas are gritty and gory — unflinchingly depicting frantic surgery, overworked doctors and harsh hospital bureaucracy. And the patient doesn’t always survive.

Although such realism may be frightening, Smoak said it helps reduce unrealistic expectations by patients.

However, he suggested the shows should tackle more political topics such as uninsured patients, the bureaucracy of HMOs and a patient’s bill of rights.

“Can’t you picture an episode where someone gets a prescription from the ER and says, ‘Well, doctor, I won’t be able to eat next week if I buy your medicine,”‘ Smoak said. “What kind of powerful message would that carry to the public and the policy-makers of our country?”

Donna Hill Howes, a registered nurse who chaired the panel, urged television shows to pay more attention to nurses. Hospitals across the country have reported that low pay and more varied opportunities for women in medicine have created a nursing shortage.

Mark Morocco, a medical adviser to “ER” and the medical-emergency show “Third Watch,” said nurse characters on TV are too often unimportant background figures or sex objects.

He cited NBC’s Aaron Spelling-produced hospital show “Nightingales,” which spent much of its time “finding a way to get into the nurses’ locker room.” It was canceled after 12 episodes in 1989.

Many in the audience Tuesday said they were fans of “ER,” which has been television’s most popular drama for seven years, according to Nielsen Media Research.

Some said the NBC show has a responsibility to educate as well as entertain, and Wyle agreed.

“When we first started, all our technical advisers told us that emergency rooms were the primary source of health care for most Americans,” the actor said. “That’s changed in recent years, because watching ‘ER’ has become the primary source of health information. Then people go to the emergency room and compare.”

Inaccuracies usually are a result of television’s time constraints, said Samantha Corbin, co-executive producer of “Crossing Jordan,” a medical-examiner program on NBC.

“Shows have to fudge reality in terms of making this as dramatic as possible and cramming it into a 46-minute episode,” she said. “Unfortunately, (in reality) most medical conditions can’t be diagnosed, much less cured, in 46 minutes.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.