ShareThis Page
Dog show appearance an ‘honor’ |

Dog show appearance an ‘honor’

Doug Gulasy
| Thursday, December 22, 2011 12:00 a.m

Mary Hummert’s vizsla, Stryker, didn’t win any prizes at the AKC/Eukanuba National Championship dog show last weekend in Orlando, Fla.

But that doesn’t mean the two didn’t enjoy the experience.

“We did have a wonderful time,” said Hummert, 61, of Level Green in Westmoreland County. “I’ll tell you, when I got there and saw the quality of the competition, I was honored to be in that ring with those dogs. There were some beautiful dogs down there.”

Stryker, who competes under the name Grand Champion Red Oak’s Fire When Ready, lost in the “Best of Breed” competition to fellow vizsla Grand Champion Jen’s Penny Matra Baci’s Boogie Fever. A poodle named Grand Champion Jaset’s Satisfaction won Best in Show.

Hummert said the Eukanuba National Championship won’t be the end of Stryker’s competitive career — he’ll be back in the confirmation ring by spring. And in February, Stryker will take part in an agility contest for the first time.

“I’m looking forward to seeing what he’s going to do there,” Hummert said. “He enjoyed watching it down in Orlando. He was wagging his tail and sitting in those bleachers, looking down at those dogs. I think he was thinking, ‘Hey, I can do that.'”

Doug Gulasy is a Tribune-Review sports reporter. You can contact Doug at 412-388-5830, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.