ShareThis Page
Donahoe: Rooneys made ‘a mistake’ |

Donahoe: Rooneys made ‘a mistake’

| Sunday, September 5, 2004 12:00 a.m

BUFFALO, N.Y. — Tom Donahoe insists that he harbors no bitterness toward the Steelers.

He does, however, retain some strong feelings about his forced departure four-and-a-half years ago.

Donahoe, then the Steelers’ director of football operations, lost a very public power struggle with coach Bill Cowher, who offered to resign after a 6-10 season in 1999.

The Steelers instead asked for and received Donahoe’s resignation.

“I think they made a mistake,” Donahoe said. “A lot of people in the organization feel they made a mistake. But, you know, you have to run your franchise the way you want to run it, so I don’t have any hard feelings.”

Donahoe described his relationship with the Rooneys as “cordial.”

“When I see (Steelers chairman) Dan, we speak,” Donahoe said. “I’d like to think he has the same respect for me that I have for him.”

Dan Rooney agrees that the relationship is cordial but obviously does not agree that he made a mistake in choosing Cowher.

“We’re very pleased with where we’re at,” Rooney said. “We’ve extended Bill’s contract (he is signed through the 2007 season), so that pretty much tells you how we feel.”

Rooney did not want to go into details about Donahoe.

“Those days are gone,” he said. “We talk and things. I don’t think evil of him.”

The Steelers are 38-25-1 with two playoff appearances since Donahoe left. The Bills are 17-31 without a winning season under Donahoe. Both teams went 6-10 last season.

All expression drained from Donahoe’s face when he was asked to characterize his relationship with Cowher, whom he helped to hire in 1992.

“There isn’t one,” he said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.