ShareThis Page
Donato denies negativity |

Donato denies negativity

| Wednesday, April 8, 2015 12:38 a.m

On behalf of the Dave Donato for Mayor campaign, I would like to address the charges of “negativity and political mudslinging” as suggested by Mayor Cherepko on his Facebook page and city administrator Matt Gergely, who apparently is working on his campaign, in a Daily News letter to the editor.

As a former elementary teacher familiar with report cards, you would think that Mayor Cherepko would understand the concept and embrace its findings.

My campaign had nothing to do with:

#1 … The FBI ranking McKeesport 17th in violent crime nationally.

#2 … Allegheny County ranking McKeesport as highest in arson rate.

#3 … McKeesport’s dead last ranking in regional job creation, according to Department of Labor statistics.

#4 … Channel 4’s investigative series on alleged misuse of a city program.

The citizens of McKeesport deserve a healthy airing of the issues without “creating” a false narrative that your actions, programs, and policies … are not “your” responsibility.

Simply put, this mayor’s wounds are self-inflicted. Addressing crime, job creation, economic development, youth recreation resurgence, and administrative restructuring, will be central themes to the city revitalization and why Dave Donato is the better choice to do this.

Dave Donato


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.