ShareThis Page
Dorfman: Robot Portfolio tripped up as single energy stock nose-dives |

Dorfman: Robot Portfolio tripped up as single energy stock nose-dives

A single disastrous energy stock was enough to scuttle my Robot Portfolio last year.

The portfolio suffered a 3.8 percent loss in 2015, dragged down by a 62 percent drop for Atwood Oceanics Inc. (ATW), an offshore driller that suffered as energy prices collapsed. The defeat reduced, but by no means eliminated, this portfolio’s long-term edge over the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.

The Robot Portfolio is a 10-stock portfolio that I publish each year in my first column of the year. I don’t use judgment in picking the stocks; the selection is purely statistical. Start with all U.S. stocks with a market value of $500 million or more. Eliminate those with debt greater than equity. Then select the 10 stocks selling for the lowest multiple of the past four quarters’ earnings.

The point is simple. Investors could do a lot worse than to buy the most out-of-favor stocks in the market, as measured by that old standby, the price/earnings ratio.

Sparkling record

During the past 17 years, this naïve stock-picking method has worked strikingly well. The Robot boasts a compound average annual return of 15.58 percent, compared to 4.17 percent for the S&P 500. Figures include reinvested dividends. The cumulative return for the Robot stocks has been 1,119 percent, versus 123 percent for the index.

That strong return has been achieved despite a sickening plunge of 60.8 percent in 2008. In 17 outings, the Robot has notched a profit 13 times and has beaten the S&P 500 10 times.

Bear in mind that results for my column picks are theoretical and don’t reflect actual trades, trading costs or taxes. The record of my column selections shouldn’t be confused with the performance I achieve for clients. And past performance doesn’t guarantee future results.

New picks

Here are the 10 stocks the Robot paradigm picks for 2016.

The cheapest stock in the group is Atwood Oceanics at two times earnings, the very stock that wrecked the Robot’s performance in 2015. The energy debacle is now 18 months old, and I think Atwood’s chances are better this year, although I suspect the true bottom in energy stocks is still several months away.

Second cheapest is PDL BioPharma Inc. (PDLI), also at two times earnings. This is a small biotech company based in Incline Village, Nev. The big worry here is expiring licensing agreements.

For three times earnings, you can buy shares in Chemtura Corp (CHMT), not that anyone wants to. The Philadelphia-based company makes a variety of chemicals, including lubricants, flame retardants and oil drilling fluids. It has lost money in 10 of the past 15 years and was in bankruptcy for 20 months in 2009-2010. Recent results look good, though.

MGIC Investors Corp. (MTG) has a price/earnings ratio of 3. It provides mortgage insurance — a line of business that scares investors since mortgage defaults were at the heart of the 2007-2009 financial crisis.

Weighing in at four times earnings is Antero Resources (AR), a Denver-based oil and gas company that drills mainly in West Virginia, Ohio and Pennsylvania. If I were to invest here, I’d take only half a position now and hope to snatch the rest at a lower price.

Voya Financial Inc. (VOYA), was spun off in 2013 from ING, a big Dutch financial company. It sells savings vehicles, investments and insurance products. At four times earnings, it is cheaper than I think it deserves, perhaps because it is so little known.

HP Inc. (HPQ), formerly Hewlett-Packard, recently split in two. The consulting and data-center businesses went to Hewlett Enterprise, while HP got the troubled personal-computer and printer businesses. Can this ship be righted? Maybe, and at five times earnings, it might be a good speculation.

Tempting to me at six times earnings is Greenbrier Companies Inc. (GBX) of Oswego, Ore., a maker of freight cars and tanker cars. It provides repairs and other services to railroads. Only a year and a half ago, this stock sold for $73, versus about $33 today.

Overseas Shipholding Group (OSG), based in New York, operates a fleet of oil tankers. It turned to profitability in 2015 after five loss years and emerged from bankruptcy after a three-year stay in Chapter 11. Famed hedge fund manager John Paulson owns shares. The P/E is 6.

Rounding out this year’s Robot roster is Fossil Group Inc. at six times earnings. Fossil sells watches and other accessories. Its watch business was severely hurt last year by the advent of the Apple Watch and other computer-watches. The problem is real, but I think the 67 percent decline in the stock last year was excessive.

Disclosure: I own shares of Greenbrier Companies for one client. I do not currently own the other stocks discussed in today’s column.

John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments in Boston and a syndicated columnist. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.