ShareThis Page
Downtown West Newton details plan |

Downtown West Newton details plan

| Tuesday, September 9, 2003 12:00 a.m

WEST NEWTON – George Sam, vice president of Downtown West Newton Inc., presented to council Monday goals in the “Bridge to Tomorrow” campaign to make the borough more appealing to travelers, particularly those on the Youghiogheny River Trail.

Some of the problems that make the town less appealing, Sam said at council’s meeting, are unsightly and deteriorated buildings and the lack of businesses and attractions. He proposed creating parklets, riverfront access points, a spur trail leading into town and cycle-friendly access from the bridge.

The century-old bridge, he said, could become “a focal point of town.” Because it’s part of a state road, the bridge also may be the basis for seeking a federal Transportation Enhancement Grant channeled through the state.

According to Sam, the project may cost more than $400,000. “We may also get historical funding,” he said.

Downtown West Newton received $15,000 from the Laurel Highlands Visitors Bureau for a study by Gannett Fleming, an architectural and engineering firm in Pittsburgh. The next step is for representatives from Downtown West Newton and the Main Street project to meet with council, then with the public for input.

If the campaign proceeds, council will be obligated to provide 20 percent of the funding and agree to long-term maintenance of whatever is developed.

“If we don’t get backing from the community and from the borough, we can’t do it,” Sam said.

July 4, 2008, is the target completion date.

In other business, council:

  • Passed an ordinance that mandates tap-ins to existing or future public water lines.

  • Passed an ordinance that authorizes the West Newton Volunteer Fire Company to bill third parties for expenses incurred for emergency services and equipment.

  • Considered enacting an ordinance in response to complaints about roaming cats.

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.