Drawing the lines: ASD might study policy |

Drawing the lines: ASD might study policy

FORD CITY — The Armstrong School Board has been scrutinizing its buildings and staffing for the past several years in an effort to lower costs — now its attendence lines could be next.

The board reached a consensus last night its regular meeting to study its attendAnce line policy. Directors Karen Bower, Tim Ashe, Joseph Close and Board President Terry Rupp all agreed that the policy should be looked at, while directors James Solak and D. Royce Smeltzer disagreed.

“I’m not completely convinced this policy is doing this district a service,” Rupp said. “I think it’s precluding us from actually doing viable options.”

The board did not vote on the subject — Rupp simply polled the board as to whether they thought looking at the policy was worthwhile.

Solak, however, said the board has lacked direction, shrugging off a districtwide look at the lines in the past. He added that Rupp’s request to study attendence lines was prompted by dissatisfaction with a recent report by consultant Daniel Dancu on the district’s buildings.

Smeltzer said the discussion was “muddying more waters” in the district.

Rupp said the district must drive down its costs, and that the board was letting buildings dictate staffing, regardless of the number of students in a building.

But Solak said Rupp has repeatedly said buildings need to be closed, but refused to vote to close Kittanning Township, instead looking for ways to fill it up.

The building has been the focus of discussions before, especially when it comes to attendence lines, and Rupp said he didn’t know what the right answer was, but that he wants to look at all the options.

“When are you going to know?” Solak asked Rupp. “We’ve been talking about this for four or five years.”

Rupp did not indicate exactly what the board would look at in its attendence policy, but rather suggested that everything is on the table at this point.

The discussion was a continuation of an argument on the same subject last Monday, prompted by an e-mail from Rupp, who was not at that meeting.

“I guess I lit the fuse on a stink bomb then wasn’t there,” Rupp said.

The board also approved a revised cost estimate for the West Hills project to reflect the recent costs associated with the wetlands study. The building project is now set at $14.25 million. A hearing on the new school project is scheduled for Oct. 20.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.