ShareThis Page
Dredging revisited |

Dredging revisited

| Monday, June 16, 2008 12:00 a.m

To their credit, Allegheny Township supervisors are moving to enforce a new noise ordinance.

And the state Department of Environmental Protection says it will help if the township determines that a river-dredging company is violating noise levels.

Last week, supervisors agreed to have a sound engineer monitor the noise levels. River Forest residents say the company is violating new lower decibel levels. Residents have been unhappy with Hanson Aggregates operations on the Allegheny River since they began last year.

Supervisors adopted the ordinance after residents complained dredging was going on seven days a week and often from 6 a.m. until 11 p.m.

That’s certainly an infringement on the quiet that a residential neighborhood can expect.

In March, permits for the dredging issued by the DEP and Army Corps of Engineers were amended, placing new restrictions on Hanson. Dredging is restricted by hours and to the Harrison Township side of the river, for example.

Both sides have filed complaints with the state Environmental Hearing Board and a hearing will be held.

We can understand both sides. Hanson makes its living dredging sand and gravel from the river. But residents living along the river deserve their peace and quiet.

It’s a tough balance. Perhaps the DEP should restrict how long operations can remain near residential areas.

Supervisors are reluctant to get into a lengthy and expensive legal battle with the company. But if residents file a lawsuit to force township officials to move on violations, that will cost the township, as well.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.