ShareThis Page
Driving drunk in Leechburg might cost more |

Driving drunk in Leechburg might cost more

| Tuesday, February 6, 2001 12:00 a.m

LEECHBURG: Drunken drivers who are stopped in the borough could end up paying $30 for a Breathalyzer test administered by police during a traffic stop.

Council voted 6-0 on Monday to advertise the proposed ordinance. It must vote on it again before it becomes law.

‘Leechburg would be a trend-setter in Armstrong County,’ Solicitor James Favero said. He added he didn’t know of any other municipality in the county that had such a policy.

Favero said that any person that pleads guilty or is found guilty of drunken driving would have to pay the fee.

If charges are dismissed or withdrawn, or a person is found not guilty, the person would not have to pay the fee.

Council had been approached by the police department after officers learned that Vandergrift had a similar policy, Favero said.

Council President Anthony Defilippi said it’s a way for the borough to recoup its costs.

‘This could become a trend with other municipalities because it could become a drain in general funds,’ Defilippi said.

Police have to pay for equipment used for the test, such as the mouthpiece and other parts that are changed between uses and for cleaning.

The fee would replace money in the borough’s general fund, which is used to pay for the test. Currently, taxpayers pay for each test.

Leechburg Police Chief Alan Tarr was not at Monday’s council meeting or at the station to answer questions concerning how many motorists are convicted of drunken driving in the borough each year.

Favero said the county’s prothonotary’s office has requested that the fee not be assessed as part of the prosecution costs.

A person who registers 0.10 percent on the test is charged with drunken driving, but people who register under that amount could still be charged if they are driving recklessly.

Leslie Suhr can be reached at

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.