Drug, DUI cases recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville |

Drug, DUI cases recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville


Monroeville District Court Judge Jeffrey Herbst handled these cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. Charges were filed by Monroeville police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

  • Brady Glover, 33, of Butler on charges of possession of controlled substances and possession of drug paraphernalia. Charges were filed July 15.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Alisha Kubiak, 37, of Pitcairn on charges of aggravated harassment by prisoner, access device used to obtain property or service, tampering with physical evidence, theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property, disorderly conduct, promoting prostitution, possession of drug paraphernalia, harassment, criminal mischief and public drunkenness. Pitcairn police filed the charges Sept. 7.
  • Kacee Walczak, 40, of Monroeville on charges of driving under the influence, exceeding 35 mph in an urban district by 25 mph and no headlights. Charges were filed July 6.
  • Victor Diaz, 23, of Plum on charges of possession of drug paraphernalia, possession of controlled substances, possession of marijuana, driving under the influence, driving an unregistered vehicle and operating a vehicle without a valid inspection. Charges were filed May 25.
  • Jamie Coulson, 25, of Greensburg on charges of possession of drug paraphernalia, driving under the influence, operating a vehicle without required financial responsibility, operating a vehicle without required financial responsibility, disregard traffic lane, careless driving and failure to use safety belt. State police filed the charges April 11.
  • Dominic Banks, 25, of East Pittsburgh on two counts of possession of controlled substances and four counts of possession with intent to deliver. Charges were filed Aug. 23.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.