ShareThis Page
DUI suspect charged in scuffles with troopers |

DUI suspect charged in scuffles with troopers

| Thursday, September 23, 2010 12:00 a.m

A Mt. Pleasant Township man stopped by police early Wednesday on suspicion of driving under the influence is facing multiple criminal charges for fighting with two state troopers.

Eugene F. King, 47, of 155 Kibe Road, Acme, was pulled over along Route 31 in Donegal Township at 2:35 a.m. for suspicion of driving drunk after he drove across the double-yellow lines and then onto the berm, police said.

According to court documents filed by Trooper Robert Daerr, King threw his wallet out of the driver’s-side window after being pulled over in his 2001 Dodge van. He then refused to perform field sobriety tests. Daerr said King was combative, repeatedly saying to Daerr and Trooper Brian Thomas, “make me.”

The officers said they had to use “reasonable force” to load King into the patrol vehicle for transport to Excela Health Frick hospital in Mt. Pleasant for a blood test, which King refused.

King continued to scuffle with the troopers at the hospital and again at the state police barracks, where he was taken for processing.

He was arraigned before Ligonier District Judge Denise Snyder Thiel and released on $20,000 signature bond pending a preliminary hearing Oct. 1.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.