Duquesne blasts La Salle |

Duquesne blasts La Salle

Mike Hilliard ran for a school-record 323 yards and five touchdowns as Duquesne rolled to a 62-14 victory over La Salle on Saturday night at Rooney Field.

Hilliard, who carried the ball 31 times before leaving the game early in the third quarter, scored on runs of 2, 40, 8, 2, and 2 yards to break the Duquesne record of four rushing touchdowns set by Pedro Bowman in 1983. Hilliard also broke the school rushing record of 317 yards set by Joe Rue in 2001. His five touchdown passes tied a Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference record. His rushing total was the second-best in MAAC history.

Duquesne (2-2, 1-0 MAAC) jumped out to a 35-7 halftime lead with Hilliard’s first four touchdowns and a 2-yard touchdown pass from Niel Loebig to Michel Warfield. Loebig completed 10 of 17 passes for 108 yards.

La Salle (1-3, 0-1) scored on a 1-yard run by Melvin Bryant and a 45-yard run by Kevin Sullivan. La Salle scored touchdowns on a 1-yard run by Melvin Bryant with 8:07 to play in the second quarter and a 45-yard run by Kevin Sullivan in the fourth quarter.

Duquesne led 35-7 at the half.

La Salle quarterback Ed Marynowitz completed 16 of 31 passes for 193 yards. Kevin Smith led Duquesne’s defense with 11 tackles, including six solo. Duquesne finished with 582 yards of total offense to 267 for La Salle.

Geneva 24, Trinity International 21 — Geneva (2-1) came from behind to upset Trinity (3-1). With 12:22 to play, Geneva’s Josh Mullen scored on a 1-yard run to put Golden Tornadoes ahead for good. Mullen rushed for 126 yards on 23 carries and two touchdowns. Brandon Nathan added 111 yards on the ground for Geneva.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.