Duquesne women coast past Robert Morris |

Duquesne women coast past Robert Morris

Karen Price

The Duquesne women’s basketball team led from Alex Gensler’s opening 3-point shot, and Robert Morris was never in the game in a 61-34 win for the Dukes on Sunday at Sewall Center.

Gensler led Duquesne (3-1) with 17 points and added seven rebounds, three assists and three steals. Freshman Wumi Agunbiade had 14 points, nine rebounds and five steals, and Samantha Polino had 10 points. The Dukes outscored the Colonials, 32-16, in the paint and 17-0 on second-chance points.

They had a double-digit lead eight minutes into the game and led, 37-21, at the half.

“Right now we have players making shots on the perimeter, which opens up our inside game,” Duquesne coach Suzie McConnell-Serio said. “When we go inside and they go to double-team our post players, we’re there for kickouts on the perimeter. We struggled against their zone a year ago, and coming into this game that’s what we were prepared for.”

Duquesne, whose only loss came at then-No. 10 West Virginia, continues its stretch of six straight road games Thursday at Akron.

Robert Morris (0-5) has only two returning starters and bears little resemblance to the team that upset Duquesne, 69-61, last year.

The Colonials shot just 18.5 percent in the second half, were 0 for 8 from 3-point range and scored just 13 points after intermission. They turned the ball over 26 times and had only one player score in double figures — Yohanna Morton, who had 12 points.

Robert Morris scored one point during a seven-minute span in the second half, and has six points in the final six minutes of the game.

“We’re struggling to find everything; it’s not just our offense,” Robert Morris coach Sal Buscaglia said. “We lost a lot of key players, and the two kids we have back weren’t our go-to players. We lost all our go-to players, and that makes you a work in progress.”

With 12 of its first 14 games on the road, Robert Morris won’t be home until Jan. 15.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.