ShareThis Page
Duquesne women improve to 5-1 |

Duquesne women improve to 5-1

Karen Price
| Sunday, December 4, 2011 12:00 a.m

The Duquesne women’s basketball team never trailed Saturday in an 83-60 victory over Ohio at the A.J. Palumbo Center.

Four players scored in double-figures for the Dukes, including senior guard Alex Gensler, who scored a game-high 22 points and accounted for four of Duquesne’s five field goals from beyond the 3-point line. Sophomore forward Wumi Agunbiade added 15 points and 16 rebounds. Sophomore forward Orsi Szecsi had 15 points, nine rebounds and five assists, and senior point guard Vanessa Abel had 15 points and five assists.

The Dukes (5-1) also outrebounded their opponent for the first time this year, 47-33.

“It was a good win, no doubt,” coach Suzie McConnell-Serio said. “When I look at the stat sheet, the one thing that stands out to me is rebounding margin because that’s an area where we’ve struggled. I challenged the team in the locker room before the game. It’s something we needed to draw attention to, something we need to continue to work on and where we need to get better. I was proud of the way our players responded to the challenge.”

Ohio (3-3) pulled within six points with seven minutes to play in the first half, but Gensler hit a 3-pointer. Jocelyn Floyd then stole the ball and passed to Abel for a jump shot, sparking a 9-0 run. The Dukes ended the first half leading, 40-25.

This was the second of six consecutive home games for the Dukes.

Karen Price is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.