ShareThis Page
DVD Review: ‘Marie Antoinette’ pretty but shallow |

DVD Review: ‘Marie Antoinette’ pretty but shallow

Garrett Conti
| Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:00 a.m

Sofia Coppola received her worst reviews for her third turn in the director’s chair, a fresh biopic titled “Marie Antoinette.”

Kirsten Dunst, in her second go-round with Coppola (the first was 1999’s “Virgin Suicides”) plays the French queen, husband to Jason Schwartzman’s King Louis XVI.

Coppola, as usual, puts together an aesthetically pleasing picture with excellent scenery and costume work. The score also is strong, featuring a mix of modern and period music. This musical approach didn’t work too well in the medieval movie “A Knight’s Tale” (2001) — joust scenes with Queen, anyone• — but Coppola makes it work here.

While these factors make the film appealing on the surface, you need only to scratch it to see how shallow “Marie Antoinette” is. Coppola’s film lacks in character and plot development.

The acting is passable, but characters pop in and out of Antoinette’s life with little explanation, and events take different turns for no reason. Unless you’re a history buff, you might feel lost in this one. You might just come out thinking Marie was the Paris Hilton or Lindsay Lohan of the 1700s, but maybe that was the point.

Extras include deleted scenes, and the making-of featurette is definitely worth a look, especially if you enjoyed the costumes. And Cribs feature gives you a tour of Louis XVI’s residences.

Rent it: If you want to party like it’s 1759.

Additional Information:


Marie Antoinette

PG-13; 2006 Two stars

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.