ShareThis Page
East Deer may tinker with traffic signals |

East Deer may tinker with traffic signals

| Friday, July 8, 2005 12:00 a.m

The additional traffic created by Pittsburgh Mills mall shoppers may cause officials to repair traffic lights at two East Deer intersections.

After receiving a recommendation to upgrade the Freeport Road intersections with New Kensington Bridge and Third Street, commissioners said they want to see the new traffic patterns before making a decision.

The total cost would be about $8,500, and since the project isn’t in this year’s budget, officials are not sure whether they can proceed.

“We’ll evaluate which is the most critical and do what we can,” Commissioners Chairman Tony Taliani said. “We want to put the money where it will do the most good and budget the rest for next year.”

In other news:

Freeport Road may be lined with six new bus stops soon courtesy of Lamar Advertising.

On Tuesday, commissioners plan to accept the Pittsburgh-based firm’s proposal to build and maintain the new stops at no cost to the township.

The township will receive $700 per stop per year from Lamar.

Plans include stops along Freeport Road and Crawford Run Road, Murrayhill Road, First Street, Second Street, Bartch Street and Crystal View Drive.

Taliani said the stops may extend onto private property, but the township intends to discuss any such problems with property owners before building begins.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.