ShareThis Page
East Huntingdon prepares for emergencies |

East Huntingdon prepares for emergencies

| Friday, April 27, 2001 12:00 a.m

ALVERTON – The East Huntingdon Township supervisors approved a motion to establish a local emergency management agency. Supervisors have also developed a comprehensive emergency plan.

According to Supervisor Howard Keefer, the township has been cooperating with 911 Emergency Services for the past three months on the emergency plan.

‘It’s an initiative where 911 tries to see through and make sure that every municipality is prepared in case of an emergency or disaster,’ said Supervisor Rob Zelmore.

The purpose of the emergency plan is for the township to have a strategy and a set list of guidelines to follow in case of a disaster that could range from weather disasters and vehicle accidents to broken gas lines and hazardous material spills. The Department of Public Safety gave the township a template to follow, and the incorporation of the plan will allow the township to know who they would call if a certain thing happened, said Keefer. In the time of an emergency in the township, Keefer will be the emergency management coordinator and the township building will be used as the command center. Keefer has taken three tests to prepare for the position, and although the township building will initially be used as the command center, it could change to accommodate the location of a disaster that wasn’t necessarily township wide. Although Keefer is in charge for the township, 911 will still be ultimately in charge and would tell Keefer when to enact their plan.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.