ShareThis Page
Education benefits overstated |

Education benefits overstated

| Friday, November 4, 2011 12:00 a.m

A Senate committee corrected a September report about veterans benefits collected by for-profit colleges because it relied on incorrect data and overstated the amount the companies received.

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee mistakenly combined two years of data into one, committee chairman Senator Tom Harkin, Democrat from Iowa, said on Thursday. Eight for-profit colleges received about $626 million in veteran education benefits in the most recent academic year, instead of $1 billion as reported Sept. 22, he said.

Harkin’s office, along with the Education Department and states’ attorneys general, have accused for-profit colleges of exploiting students, including veterans, with aggressive recruiting tactics and misleading marketing claims. The colleges have said they provide educational opportunities to low-income, minority and older students who frequently encounter obstacles that prevent them from attending traditional campuses.

“Through a reckless rush to judgment, the committee’s majority members unleashed an unwarranted tidal wave of negative publicity for our schools,” the Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities, a Washington-based group representing U.S. for-profit colleges, said in a statement.

The Post-9/11 GI Bill distributed $4.4 billion to almost 6,000 institutions educating veterans from 2009 to 2011, according to the report. The seven top recipients were for-profit colleges, even after the correction, it said.

“Upon discovering this error, HELP Committee staff re-analyzed the data and found that the central findings remain unchanged: The top 10 recipients of Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits are the same, and eight of the 10 biggest recipients in 2010-2011 are for-profit colleges with poor rates of student success,” committee spokeswoman Justine Sessions said in an e-mailed statement.

The corrected report shows the increase in dollars was slower than first reported. Revenue from veterans benefits at Apollo Group Inc., which owns the University of Phoenix, increased 73 percent to $133 million in the 2010-2011 academic year from a year earlier. The incorrect report said it almost tripled to $210 million.

Similar increases were mistakenly reported for Education Management Corp., based in Pittsburgh; ITT Educational Services Inc., in Carmel, Ind.; DeVry Inc., in Downers Grove, Ill.; Career Education Corp., based in Schaumburg, Ill.; Strayer Education Inc., based in Herndon, Va.; Corinthian Colleges Inc., based in Santa Ana, Calif.; and Washington Post Co.’s Kaplan Inc.

The committee also overstated the benefit revenue received by the University of Maryland system and the University of Texas system, the two largest non-profit recipients of veterans benefits.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.