Education task force fails its mission
Mayor Tom Murphy’s task force on Pittsburgh’s schools has spent a lot of time, energy and money to produce a report that largely tells us what we have known for some time and offers recommendations devoid of imagination or containing any meaningful reform in the way education is delivered. The report gets little credit from us for recognizing things that are very obvious, such as the reality that good teachers, strong principals and classroom order are important.
The commission says city schools perform very poorly academically and are extremely expensive with an operating budget of nearly $14,000 per pupil. The Allegheny Institute has been relentlessly making that point for many years. Again, there can be little credit for reporting the obvious. The facts have been widely known for some time. However, the school board and the teachers’ union would have us believe everything is fine and spend enormous amounts of energy trying to obfuscate the true picture.
When it comes to recommendations, the task force does get credit for calling for a tax reduction and for recognizing the inability of the fractious school board to address the real problems facing the district. But the recommendation to move to an appointed school board, while a seemingly bold suggestion, is really a temporizing step. It should be remembered that Pittsburgh went to an elected school board because of unhappiness with an appointed board. And, notwithstanding the report’s praise for the accomplishments of appointed boards, it is important to note that Cleveland, Detroit, Philadelphia and Harrisburg all have appointed boards. None of those districts would ever be held up as examples of schools that should be emulated.
Funding & failure
The report claims that the state is only funding 36 percent of Pittsburgh’s education bill and that pressure should be brought to get that raised to 50 percent. However, the decline in the state’s share reflects the district’s failure to control expenses and is not due to any decline in the state’s allocation. The only reasonable way to increase the state’s percentage to 50 percent would be to slow the growth in total spending. And, for all of the task force rhetoric about the need to reduce costs, it advocates new educational programs such as full-day kindergarten and early-childhood programs that will only increase costs — with no proven ability to produce lasting academic success.
However, the real failure of the mayoral commission is that there are many meaningful reforms that could have been recommended, but because of political correctness and fear of the teachers’ union, those recommendations never had a chance of making it into the final report. As it is, what we get is a lot of platitudinous statements about the need for accountability and excellence. The task force purposely stayed well away from recommending school choice as an option for empowering parents in their child’s education. Undoubtedly, the best way to empower parents whose children are trapped in the miserably performing Pittsburgh Public Schools system is to offer parents the ability to choose where their children go to school — including charters and private schools.
If the task force had been broad enough to include some free-market types and some people who are not afraid to challenge the oppressive conventional wisdom that pervades the city’s political and civic leadership, there might have been at least a modicum of attention paid to some serious, innovative reforms that could make a real difference. Instead, we get admonitions to try to do better.
Here is a short list of what should have been in the task force report:
The school system should recognize the enormous power of competition to produce excellence. Clearly, the union will fight such a program with every resource at its disposal. However, on this there should be no compromise. Schools are for educating children and are paid for by taxpayers. They do not exist for the comfort of the teachers and administration. We have for too long put up with excuses and avoidance of responsibility.
Jake Haulk is president of the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy. Frank Gamrat is a research associate there. What’s your view on reforming education in Pittsburghâ¢ E-mail us at: [email protected]