ShareThis Page
Standardized Keystone Exams face elimination under proposal |

Standardized Keystone Exams face elimination under proposal

Jamie Martines
| Monday, July 3, 2017 1:30 p.m.

A reprieve from standardized testing could be in sight for the state’s students.

Lawmakers are considering a bill — sponsored by the minority chairman of the Senate Education Committee, Chester County Democrat Andrew Dinniman — that seeks to end the Keystone Exams and replace them with the SAT.

“It’s to end high-stakes testing, because there are many bright students who do well in courses but simply can’t take tests,” Dinniman said.

The bill would eliminate the Keystone Exams, which are administered in algebra I, literature and biology. It also would end the use of any graduation exams in the state.

Local districts would be allowed to determine criteria for graduation, but they would not be allowed to use a single test or series of tests to determine whether a student can graduate, Dinniman said.

He added that graduation requirements should look at a student’s body of coursework.

The Pennsylvania Department of Education requires 21 credits across various subject areas for graduation.

Keystone Exams and project-based assessments were added as a state graduation requirement in 2014. As of 2016, those requirements were put on hold until the 2018-19 school year while the education department and lawmakers evaluate improved requirements.

Under the new system, students would be required to take the SAT only to fulfill federal requirements for data reporting.

That would still be better than taking the Keystones, Dinniman said. He said it would benefit students because colleges and employers are likely to look at SAT scores.

In addition, the cost of purchasing the SAT exams and preparation materials is likely to be cheaper than the materials associated with the Keystones, Dinniman said.

In June, Gov. Tom Wolf signed a bill that makes accommodations for students in career and technical education, or CTE, schools when it comes to the Keystones.

Introduced in December by Reps. Mike Turzai, R-Bradford Woods, and Mike Tobash, R-Pottsville, the change allows high school students in vocation and technical programs to demonstrate competency through their grades and industry-based certification.

Examples include national certification and licensing tests for nursing, auto repair and cosmetology.

Principals across the state are happy to have more flexibility with these exams, said Mark Korcinsky, Pennsylvania state coordinator for the National Association of Secondary School Principals.

“The testing itself consumes a lot of instructional time,” Korcinsky said, noting also that requirements that determine testing logistics put a strain on a district’s staffing, scheduling and finances.

In addition, exams that measure a student’s performance and improvement over time would give teachers a better understanding of what a student knows.

“They’re looking for multiple points of measure that they can use to assess proficiency, but more importantly, growth,” Korcinsky said.

The Keystones are administered in the spring, but results are often not returned to schools until after the start of the following school year. As a result, Korcinsky said, it’s difficult to follow up with students who didn’t perform well and ensure they’re getting the right support.

But changing the way the state’s standardized tests are administered isn’t as easy as swapping one test for another or eliminating the exams altogether.

This summer, Pennsylvania must submit a new education plan to the federal government that outlines how the state will measure things such as student achievement and teacher performance.

Student performance on standardized tests such as the Keystones is linked to teacher evaluations.

This is something some public school advocates hope will change as the Legislature considers alternatives to the Keystones.

Standardized tests such as the Keystones do not offer an even playing field by which to measure teacher performance, said Mark DiRocco, executive director of the Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators.

Districts often have varying means and resources to prepare students to perform well on the exam, he said.

The organization is in favor of eliminating the Keystones as a federal accountability test and agrees that the SAT, typically taken during a student’s junior year, could be a suitable alternative.

“We would like to see the Keystones and the PSSAs reduced in the amount of time needed for kids to take the test,” DiRocco said. “We just think that there’s too much testing time going on.”

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-850-2867, or via Twitter @Jamie_Martines.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.