ShareThis Page
West Mifflin schools superintendent charged with DUI |

West Mifflin schools superintendent charged with DUI

West Mifflin Area School District
State police pulled over Daniel Robert Castagna, 41, for speeding and careless driving last Friday in Center, court records show.

State police charged the superintendent of West Mifflin Area School District with drunken driving this week following a traffic stop in Beaver County.

State police pulled over Daniel Robert Castagna, 41, for speeding and careless driving last Friday in Center, court records show.

Charges filed Tuesday against Castagna include two counts of driving under the influence, speeding and careless driving.

Court records did not list an attorney for Castagna. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Oct. 27.

“The district takes these allegations seriously,” Solicitor Matthew Racunas said in a statement to Tribune-Review news partner WPXI-TV. “However, the law requires that Dr. Castagna be provided with due process. Currently, there are no convictions relating to any offense. The district will continue to closely monitor the situation as it proceeds through the court system going forward.”

Racunas declined further comment.

Castagna isn’t the only West Mifflin school employee facing troublesome accusations this week.

The district said Wednesday that it placed an assistant coach on administrative leave over accusations of inappropriate contact with a student. District officials notified West Mifflin police, who are conducting a separate probe.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.