ShareThis Page
Edwards bashes Bush strategy |

Edwards bashes Bush strategy

| Wednesday, September 29, 2004 12:00 a.m

Democratic vice presidential nominee John Edwards on Tuesday accused President Bush of bungling the war in Iraq while losing focus on the fight against international terrorism.

Speaking at Carnegie Mellon University, the North Carolina senator pledged that a White House headed by Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry would not “take our eye off the continuing threat of Osama bin Laden and the people who perpetrated 9/11.”

“When John Kerry is the president of the United States, we will find these terrorists and we will crush them before they can do harm to the American people,” Edwards said at a town hall meeting in Wiegand Gymnasium.

His appearance on the Oakland campus underscores the fierce competition for Pennsylvania’s 21 electoral votes in the Nov. 2 election. Kerry, a Massachusetts senator, used Pittsburgh as a stage to announce Edwards as his running mate at a Downtown rally in July.

Bush has made frequent visits to the region, including a stop in Allegheny County last week to survey storm damage and console flood victims.

Edwards fielded about a dozen questions during the two-hour meeting. He touched on issues ranging from rising health-care costs and declining veterans’ benefits, to environmental concerns and the need for more jobs.

He threw his sharpest jabs at the Bush administration over its handling of the war.

“Iraq is a mess and it’s a mess because of two people: George Bush and Dick Cheney. They told us they had a plan — not true. They told us they had enough troops to secure the country — not true.”

Edwards renewed his charge that the Republicans are “fear-mongering” by suggesting that al-Qaida would prefer that the Democrats win.

“Let me say this in very simple language. For them to exploit one of the greatest tragedies in American history for personal gain is wrong.”

U.S. Rep. Melissa Hart, R-Bradford Woods, responded for the Bush campaign, charging that Kerry and Edwards “have taken too many positions on the war on terror to count.”

“Their new rhetoric of defeat and retreat is the wrong message to send to our troops, our allies and most definitely our enemies.”

Hart’s statement echoed a refrain from the GOP that paints Kerry as a flip-flopper on key issues. She said Kerry and Edwards “shift positions based on the headlines of the day,” while Bush “has been decisive and determined” in fighting terrorism.

Edwards was joined at the event by Kristen Breitweiser, of Middletown, N.J., widow of Ron Breitweiser, who was killed when terrorists steered a hijacked plane into the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.

Breitweiser, who has criticized Bush’s response to the terrorist attacks, told the estimated 1,000 people at the meeting that “in my heart, I know we will be safer with John Kerry and John Edwards” in the White House.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.