ShareThis Page
Elderly mom’s death a homicide, coroner rules |

Elderly mom’s death a homicide, coroner rules

| Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:00 a.m

Mary Yecko, 85, was suffocated, and her death was a homicide, Allegheny County Coroner Cyril Wecht ruled Wednesday.

A visiting nurse found the bedridden Yecko’s body on Sept. 2 in the bedroom of the Baldwin Borough home she shared with her son, Albert, 62. Police believe Mary Yecko’s death was part of a murder-suicide.

Police found Albert Yecko dead of a self-inflicted gunshot the next day in a creek in Woodcock Township, Crawford County.

Allegheny County police homicide Sgt. Christopher Kearns said a detective had talked to Albert Yecko on the telephone several hours after his mother’s body was found. Police had no other suspects.

“The detective urged him to come back, but he said he couldn’t, and that if he did, we would take him to jail,” Kearns said. “He told us not to worry and that the autopsy would show how she died. He said that he wanted to take his own life and that he couldn’t care for his mother any longer.”

Police believe that Albert Yecko was overwhelmed by the burden of caring for his ailing mother full time.

Several days before the deaths, other family members had taken Mary Yecko to a nursing home, but Albert Yecko was upset that she wasn’t receiving proper medical care and checked her out, police said.

“He was not happy with the circumstances and conditions at the home,” Kearns said. “He was under a lot of strain, and she had problems that needed constant care.”

The surviving members of the Yecko family declined comment.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.