ShareThis Page
Election 2003: Harrison Commissioner |

Election 2003: Harrison Commissioner

| Sunday, November 2, 2003 12:00 a.m

Two candidates vying for one seat

William Poston

  • Party: Democrat

  • Age: 59

  • Residence: State Street

  • Education: Graduate of Pittsburgh Institute of Aeronautics

  • Occupation: Vice President of Michael/Howard Inc.

  • Political experience: 14 years as a Harrison Township Commissioner

    John Bua

  • Party: Republican

  • Age: 54

  • Residence: Dallas Avenue

  • Education: Graduate of Penn Technical Institute

  • Occupation: Operator for Air Products, Butler

  • Political experience: None

    On the issues

    Crime seems to be on the increase in Sheldon Park, Village Green, and the Natrona section of the township. What can you as a commissioner do to try to curb the situation?

  • William Poston: “We already have been working with that, there was a meeting with the housing authority to try to address the problems in Sheldon Park. We’re really cracked down and there has been a lot of cooperation with Harrison police. Sheldon Park has always been a good community.

    In Natrona we need to get the parents more involved and make them more responsible for their children. It’s tough to enforce a curfew, and we need to continue to work with the residents down there.”

  • John Bua: “Mr. Poston has done a good job putting a plan in place. We need to make sure the people who do relocate are law abiding citizens.”

    Question:Do you feel there should be more cooperation between municipalities•

  • Poston: “I think a lot of that already exists. With budgets the way they are its needed. There’s going to be more efforts, there is no doubt that it’s going to happen.”

  • Bua: “Sharing resources is a great idea. With my experience in business my employer shares resources and it has saved the company a great deal of money. I think the more we share the better.”

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.