ShareThis Page
Election board petitioned to hold hearing on perjury claim |

Election board petitioned to hold hearing on perjury claim

| Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:00 a.m

A Vanderbilt woman who is a member of the Fayette County voter fraud committee is asking the election board to investigate what she claims is perjury committed by another member of the group.

Jeraldine Mazza, of Flatwoods Road, has petitioned the election board to hold a hearing to investigate her claims that Joseph Malaspina, of Washington Township, committed perjury by stating and affixing his signature to three different nominating petitions for the office of committeeman for three township districts.

Mazza has previously brought this matter to the attention of the Fayette County commissioners who each appointed four persons to the 12-member voter integrity panel. Most recently, she attended the April 11 meeting and asked Chairman Vincent Vicites to remove Malspina from the panel.

Malaspina, who resides in Washington Township District 2, circulated petitions on behalf of Gloria Yuschak in township District 1 and Sean Sypolt in township District 4. These were thrown out by two Fayette County judges.

Additionally, he circulated a petition for himself in District 2.

Malaspina, at the April 11 commissioners’ meeting, said he signed the petitions to confirm that he was circulating the petitions.

Sheryl Heid, solicitor for the election board, has asked the board to schedule a hearing on Mazza’s petition and requested that she submit in writing names of witnesses and a list of exhibits.

Election board member David Lohr said the board will hear Mazza’s petition as it is “the right of every citizen in the county.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.