Archive

ShareThis Page
Elizabeth man convicted in child porn case | TribLIVE.com
News

Elizabeth man convicted in child porn case

Tribune-Review
| Saturday, February 15, 2003 12:00 a.m

An Elizabeth man has been sentenced to more than 15 years in prison for producing child pornography materials.

According to evidence presented by Assistant United States Attorney Shaun E. Sweeney, William H. Randolph sexually assaulted two girls – ages 7 and 11 – at his Elizabeth residence several times during the summer of 2000.

The girls were permitted to visit Randolph at his home that summer because he was a family friend, according to the U.S. Attorney’s office.

The girls, who are cousins, did not tell their family about the sexual assaults until investigators from Allegheny County Police, United States Postal Inspection Service and the FBI searched Randolph’s residence in September of 2000.

That search yielded a videotape and numerous Polaroid photographs depicting Randolph engaged in various sexual acts with the girls.

According to the U.S Attorney’s office, investigators later recovered an audiocassette tape in which the man can be heard coaxing one of the girls into discussing sexual acts that he wanted the two to engage in.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.