ShareThis Page
Emsworth native’s space shuttle mission pushed to April 29 |

Emsworth native’s space shuttle mission pushed to April 29

| Tuesday, April 5, 2011 12:00 a.m

A scheduling glitch has pushed back the launch date for NASA’s Endeavour voyage, on which Emsworth native Mike Fincke is serving as mission specialist.

NASA has moved the launch for Endeavour’s STS-134 mission to the afternoon of April 29 due to a conflict with a Russian Progress supply vehicle.

Endeavour previously was scheduled to take off April 19. This will be Endeavour’s last voyage and next to last for the entire 30-year shuttle program.

The Endeavour mission is being led by Fincke’s colleague and friend, Commander Mark Kelly, husband of U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, who was shot Jan. 8 in Tucson, Ariz., while meeting with constituents outside a supermarket.

Giffords is undergoing rehab in Houston. Kelly, who rejoined the mission in March, has said he hopes his wife can attend the launch.

Fincke, a Sewickley Academy graduate, has said challenges facing the mission have not stopped the crew from working together “extremely well.”

“I’m very proud of the entire system,” he said. “The crew took up the slack so Mark could have time with his wife. As soon as he came back, we haven’t missed a beat.”

Severe storms hit NASA’s Kennedy Space Center last week, causing minor damage to Endeavour’s external tank foam insulation.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.