Energy drink makers warned |

Energy drink makers warned

The Food and Drug Administration issued warning letters Wednesday to four manufacturers of alcoholic energy drinks, including one brand produced in Latrobe, saying the caffeine added to their beverages is an “unsafe food additive.”

FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg said the combinations of caffeine and alcohol in the drinks is a public health concern and can lead to “a state of wide-awake drunk.” Evidence has shown their consumption has led to alcohol poisoning, car accidents and assaults, she said.

The government could eventually seize the products if the companies continue to make and market them. The companies have 15 days to respond to the letters and either explain how they will take their products off the market or defend their drinks as safe.

The government came under increasing pressure as college students have been hospitalized in recent months after consuming the drinks. The FDA said experts have raised concerns that the caffeine in the drinks can mask a person’s feeling of intoxication, leading to risky behavior. Many of those who consume the drinks are underage drinkers.

In response to such incidents, four states — Washington, Michigan, Utah and Oklahoma — have banned the beverages. Other states, inlcuding Pennsylvania, are considering similar action.

White House Drug Policy Director Gil Kerlikowske said yesterday that the FDA’s quick action to decrease consumption of the drinks is critical.

“These products are designed, branded and promoted to encourage binge drinking,” he said.

With the FDA decision imminent, Phusion Projects, which manufactures the popular Four Loko, announced late Tuesday that it would reformulate its drinks and remove the caffeine.

The company’s statement said it was reformulating the drinks after unsuccessfully trying to deal with “a difficult and politically charged regulatory environment at both the state and federal levels.”

“We have repeatedly contended — and still believe, as do many people throughout the country — that the combination of alcohol and caffeine is safe,” said Chris Hunter, Jeff Wright and Jaisen Freeman, who identify themselves as Phusion’s three co-founders and current managing partners.

The City Brewing Co. plant in Latrobe brews four flavors of one of the targeted caffeinated alcohol drinks, Four Loko, according to labels on the 23.5-ounce cans. One flavor is brewed in City Brewing’s plant in LaCrosse, Wis., the company’s headquarters.

City Brewing’s contracts with its customers prohibit it from commenting on the products it makes, said Zack Mazzoni, controller for City Brewing’s Latrobe plant, which employs about 150.

Ken Ream, staff representative for the Communications Workers of America, which represents workers at the plant, said he had no knowledge yesterday of production changes.

Four Loko comes in several varieties, including fruit punch and blue raspberry. A single-serving can sells for about $2.50 and has an alcohol content of 12 percent, comparable to four beers, according to the company’s website.

The FDA said it views Phusion Projects’ announcement as a positive step, but officials said they have not yet heard directly from the company about its timeline for taking the drinks off the market.

The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board last month asked its 17,000 licensed beer distributors to stop selling high-energy alcohol drinks. The Malt Beverage Distributors Association of Pennsylvania last week issued its own plea for its 600 beer distributor members to stop selling the drinks.

Duquesne University last week issued a warning to students not to drink the pre-mixed alcoholic energy drinks, such as Four Loko, “until their true impact has been determined.”

The FDA also issued warning letters to Charge Beverages Corp., New Century Brewing Co. and United Brands Company Inc.

Michael Michail, president and founder of United Brands, expressed disappointment in the ruling. He said he is not aware of any incidents involving his company’s Joose alcoholic caffeine drink.

As of yesterday, a Four Loko Facebook page had more than 41,000 fans, and a similar Joose page had more than 27,000 fans. On Four Loko’s page, students mourned the demise of their favorite drink. Many blamed the government for overreaching, and some said they would make their own concoctions.

Last year the FDA notified more than two dozen manufacturers of caffeinated alcoholic beverages that it never had specifically approved the addition of caffeine to alcoholic drinks and began studying whether it was unsafe and should be outlawed. The agency noted the mix’s growing popularity among college students and its potential health and safety issues.

Yesterday’s letters focused on seven drinks made by four manufacturers, but Deputy Commissioner Josh Sharfstein said he expects the agency’s message to resonate.

“We expect these warning letters to be read across the industry,” he said.

Robert McKenna, Washington State Attorney General, praised the FDA move after nine Central Washington University students were sent to a hospital in October after a party where the students drank Four Loko. He said the drinks’ popularity has dangerously skyrocketed in the past two years.

“We can look around over the last couple of years and see something has changed, something is different,” he said. “What we are seeing now is striking.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.