Archive

ShareThis Page
EPA head, Michigan governor told to resign over Flint crisis | TribLIVE.com
News

EPA head, Michigan governor told to resign over Flint crisis

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, March 17, 2016 11:00 p.m
FlintWaterJPEG06b3a
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy testifies before a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing in Washington, Thursday, March 17, 2016, to look into the circumstances surrounding high levels of lead found in many residents' tap water in Flint, Michigan. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
516148016
Getty Images
WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 17: Gov. Rick Snyder, (R-MI), speaks during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing, about the Flint, Michigan water crisis, on Capitol Hill March 17, 2016 in Washington, DC. The committee is examining how lead ended up in the public drinking water in Flint, Michigan. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON — The head of the Environmental Protection Agency and the governor of Michigan faced calls to resign from angry lawmakers Thursday, as a congressional oversight committee focused on which level of government was most responsible for the contamination of Flint’s water supply.

Repeatedly shouting at EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, faulted her for failing to require the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality to move more quickly after lead was discovered in the tap water of some Flint homeowners.

“If you want to do the courageous thing, like you said (former EPA Midwest region head) Susan Hedman did, you, too, should resign,” Chaffetz thundered.

When McCarthy tried to explain the limits of the EPA’s power under the law, Chaffetz cut her off. “Well, it failed,” he yelled. “You failed.”

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, a Republican, received his own blasts of criticism, some of it sarcastic, when Democrats were asking the questions. “Plausible deniability only works when it’s plausible,” Pennsylvania Rep. Matt Cartwright told Snyder as he pressed why the governor was slow to act. “You were not in a medically induced coma for a year.

“We’ve had enough of your false contrition and your phony apologies,” Cartwright said. “You’re doing your dead level best to spread accountability. … You need to resign, too.”

This second of two contentious hearings on lead in Flint’s water followed the same pattern as the session Tuesday, with a federal official blaming the state for causing the disaster and the governor pointing the finger at the EPA for moving too slowly in its oversight role. Sharp questioning from members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee broke down mostly along partisan lines. Republicans targeted McCarthy and the EPA; Democrats slammed Snyder and the state.

But not in every case. With hundreds of people from the Flint area in attendance, Rep. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., who’s running for the Senate, told both officials they should quit.

McCarthy reviewed the state’s efforts to engage the state and force a quicker response throughout the second half of 2015, saying that her agency’s staff “begged” the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality to address the growing lead threat. At every turn, she said, the state agency dragged its feet in responding.

Like Hedman on Tuesday, McCarthy repeatedly declined to admit that EPA had done anything wrong. That drew several comparisons with Snyder from lawmakers, who forcefully pointed out that the governor has admitted wrongdoing.

“Were we late in getting it done? Yes,” McCarthy said. “Were there consequences to that? Yes.” But she said EPA staffers, from Hedman on down, worked “very hard” with state environmental officials to solve the crisis starting last summer and throughout the fall.

In her opening testimony, McCarthy had placed blame for the Flint water crisis squarely on Michigan, saying a state-appointed emergency manager made the decision that led to the contamination and that the state bureaucracy approved it.

“The crisis we’re seeing was the result of a state-appointed emergency manager deciding that the city would stop purchasing treated drinking water and instead switch to an untreated source to save money,” she told the committee as its hearing opened. “The state of Michigan approved that decision.”

Snyder said “systemic failures” at the state’s environmental protection agency led to the catastrophe. But he repeated his message that “a failure of government at all levels” resulted in the catastrophe. He also insisted that a water specialist at the EPA was “silenced” when he tried to warn about the lead contamination in February 2015.

“I do want to thank Miguel Del Toral, a water specialist at the EPA, who spoke up early about the crisis,” Snyder said. “Tragically, his superiors at the EPA told local leaders in Flint to ignore his call for action.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.