ShareThis Page
Ericsson takes control of Marconi branch |

Ericsson takes control of Marconi branch

| Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:00 a.m

Ericsson AB took control of the former Marconi Corp. Data Networks division in Marshall this week, including the acquisition of its five-building campus, for $64 million.

“All of the employees on this campus and reporting through this business have received employment offer letters, and are now officially Ericsson employees,” said spokeswoman Colleen Rosander.

The county values the property for tax purposes at $59 million. The state collected $642,000 in real estate transfer tax, with Marshall and the North Allegheny School District collecting $321,000 each.

Ericsson agreed in October to pay $2.1 billion for most of the business units of London-based Marconi Corp., including the local division.

“The Marconi businesses are an excellent fit for Ericsson, and we are delighted to welcome about 6,660 Marconi employees to Ericsson. This is a powerful combination that will bring value to Ericsson as well as our customers who will substantially benefit from the combination of the two companies,” said CEO Carl-Henric Svanberg in a statement.

One day after the announcement of the deal in October, Svanberg visited the Marshall Marconi campus, where he reassured about 500 employees that he expected no significant job losses in the Pittsburgh area as a result of the acquisition.

He also said he was confident that the structure in place for Marconi’s business with the U.S. federal government, which provides more than half of the unit’s $250 million in annual revenue, would likely remain intact after the deal was completed.

Founded as Fore Systems Inc. by four Carnegie Mellon University computer science professors in 1990, the Data Systems division was acquired by what became Marconi in 1999 for $4.5 billion. At its height it employed nearly 2,000 locally, but went through several downsizings after the Internet bubble burst in 2000.

In 2003, Marconi’s creditors took control of the company, swapping more than $6 billion in debt for equity. The company’s final nail in the coffin as an independent player, as telecommunications equipment sector consolidated, came last summer when its largest customer, Britain’s BT Group Inc., shut it out of a $20 billion rebuilding of its network, dubbed the 21st Century Network.

Ericsson was selected as one of the vendors for the BT project.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.