ShareThis Page
Ex-Charleroi doctor loses license |

Ex-Charleroi doctor loses license

| Friday, August 6, 2004 12:00 a.m

The state Board of Medicine has suspended the license of a former Charleroi physician.

Dr. Doyle Leroy Tarwater, of 103 Sherborne Drive, McMurray, was stripped of his medical license for 10 years after he pleaded guilty to a felony drug violation, according to a Board of Medicine press release. The suspension went into effect May 21, but the decision wasn’t released until recently.

Tarwater pleaded guilty Nov. 12, 2003, in Washington County Court to three felony counts and one misdemeanor charge related to illegal conduct on his behalf.

He illegally issued prescription drugs and made sexual advances to an undercover agent who posed as a patient.

Tarwater also pleaded guilty to Medicaid fraud and insurance fraud. Both are third degree felony violations.

Tarwater pleaded no contest to a second degree misdemeanor indecent assault charge.

Judge Paul Pozonsky sentenced Tarwater to 18 months probation for the violations.

Agents from the state Attorney General’s Medicaid fraud unit shut down Tarwater’s office on McKean Avenue in Charleroi Sept. 19, 2002, and confiscated his medical records.

Undercover agent Mindy Perry obtained five prescriptions — 224 Vicodin pills in — while making 17 medical office visits from June 24 to Sept. 9, according to an affidavit of probable cause.

Tarwater was also charged with making “indecent contact” with Perry at his office without her consent.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.