ShareThis Page
Ex-East Washington police chief could be out on bail soon |

Ex-East Washington police chief could be out on bail soon

Brian Bowling
| Wednesday, November 23, 2011 12:00 a.m

A former Washington County police chief facing federal corruption charges could be released on bail once authorities are certain his house contains no weapons, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.

Donald Solomon, 55, is charged with running protection for undercover FBI agents he thought were drug dealers and buying Tasers for an undercover agent posing as a drug dealer while Solomon was the East Washington police chief. The borough council fired him.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Cessar argued that Solomon should remain in the Allegheny County Jail because he threatened to kill himself rather than go to prison and threatened several people.

Assistant Federal Public Defender Marketa Sims argued the government cannot hold Solomon without bail because he might kill himself. She said he was blowing off steam when he made the threats.

U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti ruled prosecutors hadn’t provided sufficient evidence to hold Solomon and set his bail at $50,000 unsecured. She placed him under house arrest, with electronic monitoring, and said he could leave the house with prior approval from the Office of Probation and Pretrial Services.

Mayor Mark Pacilla, who attended Solomon’s detention hearing, said the judge’s conditions seem adequate to protect the community.

“I’m satisfied with the restraints the judge has put on him,” he said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.