ShareThis Page
Ex-Massey chief’s pay fell by nearly half |

Ex-Massey chief’s pay fell by nearly half

The Associated Press
| Thursday, April 21, 2011 12:00 a.m

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Retired Massey Energy Co. chief Don Blankenship’s total compensation fell 48 percent in 2010 as he tried to right the struggling company after the nation’s deadliest coal mine explosion in decades, an Associated Press analysis of a regulatory filing shows.

Blankenship earned just over $9 million in total compensation last year, compared with $17.3 million in 2009.

Blankenship abruptly retired from Richmond, Va.-based Massey in December, and the compensation figures don’t include his $12 million retirement package. He received $2 million Dec. 31 and is due to get the rest July 1.

His replacement, Baxter Phillips, took over in early December but isn’t expected to hold the job for long. Phillips is leaving the top spot when Massey’s $7.1 billion takeover by rival Alpha Natural Resources closes this summer.

Massey made big changes in Blankenship’s pay in 2010. The company cut his non-equity incentive compensation to $7.4 million, a 36 percent decrease from the $11.5 million he received in 2009.

The company also awarded Blankenship no stock for 2010. In 2009, he was awarded stock valued at $3.86 million at the time it was granted.

Blankenship’s salary dipped 4 percent to $900,000 last year from $933,369 in 2009. His other compensation decreased 25 percent to $459,437, from $609,875. The bulk of his other income — $382,439 — covered perks including company cars, auto insurance and personal use of company aircraft, which Massey valued at $179,097.

The Associated Press formula calculates an executive’s total compensation during the last fiscal year by adding salary, bonuses, perks, above-market interest the company pays on deferred compensation and the estimated value of stock and stock options awarded during the year. The AP formula does not count changes in the present value of pension benefits. That makes the AP total slightly different in most cases from the total reported by companies to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The value that a company assigned to an executive’s stock and option awards for 2010 was the present value of what the company expected the awards to be worth to the executive over time. Companies use one of several formulas to calculate that value. However, the number is just an estimate, and what an executive ultimately receives will depend on the performance of the company’s stock in the years after the awards are granted. Most stock compensation programs require an executive to wait a specified amount of time to receive shares or exercise options.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.