ShareThis Page
Ex-officer arrested in ticket-fixing case |

Ex-officer arrested in ticket-fixing case

Jennifer Gross
| Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:00 p.m

A former Springdale Borough police officer was arrested Tuesday on charges of agreeing to fix a man’s drunken-driving charge in exchange for a Las Vegas vacation.

Robert “Rob” D. Feil, 41, of Kuehn Drive, Trafford, was arraigned yesterday before Springdale District Justice David Sosovicka on felony charges of bribery in official and political matters. Feil, now a truck driver for a Pottsville company, also was charged with misdemeanor counts of obstruction of justice and official oppression.

Named in the complaint but not charged is former Springdale District Justice Gigi Sullivan, who was removed from office in 1999 after being indicted on charges she provided favors in exchange for heroin, cocaine and prescription pills. She later pleaded guilty to drug, corruption and forgery offenses and was sentenced to jail.

Francis “Frank” Aiello, age unknown, of Ridgway in Elk County, told a statewide grand jury that he was arrested on drunken driving charges in Springdale in February 1999, said Trooper Timothy C. Knapp, an investigator with the state police Organized Crime Unit.

Aiello, who was granted immunity in exchange for his testimony, said Feil handcuffed him for failing field sobriety tests, hit him in the face and locked him in a holding cell without giving him a blood-alcohol test, according to Knapp.

Rocky Cristini, of Brockport, and Michael Lucchetti, 46, of Kittanning, both in the auto salvage business, were named in the complaint as the people who introduced Aiello to Bill Loveland, allegedly the intermediary in the bribe.

Neither Cristini nor Lucchetti will be charged in this case, according to Kevin Harley, spokesman for state Attorney General Mike Fisher. Although not granted immunity, Loveland was a “cooperating witness,” Harley said.

Loveland could not be reached for comment yesterday. The phone line to his auto shop had been disconnected.

Loveland allegedly told Aiello that in exchange for a Las Vegas vacation for Feil and a compact disc player for Sullivan’s SUV, his DUI case could “be taken care of,” according to grand jury documents.

Aiello later met with Feil at a doughnut shop and agreed to rent a van for the officer and pay for his hotel room at the Alexis Park Hotel in Las Vegas, Knapp said. In exchange for the trip, Feil said he wouldn’t testify at Aiello’s drunken driving hearing scheduled for April 28, 1999, at Sullivan’s office, according to Knapp.

Feil did not attend the hearing and Sullivan dismissed the charges against Aiello, Knapp said.

Court records said Aiello used his credit card to pay for Feil’s nine-day, $793 stay in Vegas in July 1999, as well as a $1,439 rental van for Feil and his girlfriend to drive across country.

Aiello also paid $300 for a CD player and shipped it to Loveland, who allegedly installed it in Sullivan’s SUV, Knapp said.

Several months after his encounter with Feil, Aiello learned that his license was under suspension as a result of his drunken-driving arrest and supposed refusal of a blood-alcohol test, Knapp said.

Fisher’s office has no plans to prosecute Sullivan, according to Harley.

Feil’s mother, Connie Feil, said the family had no comment.

Feil resigned from his full-time position on the Springdale police force in 2000. He was released Tuesday after posting 10 percent of his $5,000 bond. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for March 5.

If convicted on all counts, Feil faces a maximum sentence of 11 years in prison and a $25,000 fine, Harley said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.